🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.